Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mercedes CLS 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 12 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Mercedes CLS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 155 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |