Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mercedes CL 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 2 HP less power than Mercedes CL, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mercedes CL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 23 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CL has
| |