Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 304 HP | 192 HP | |
Torque: | 427 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Ford Mustang engine produces 112 HP more power than Mazda RX-8, whereas torque is 207 NM more than Mazda RX-8. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.8 | |
The Mazda RX-8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Mazda RX-8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.34 m | |
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 34 cm longer than the Mazda RX-8, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 290 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda RX-8. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |