Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 41 HP less power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mustang consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mustang consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 32 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 106 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |