Ford Mustang 2006 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 500 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 160 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.0 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 27 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 156 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |