Ford Mustang 2006 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 500 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang 2006 engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Mustang 2009, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Ford Mustang 2009. Despite less power, Ford Mustang 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 13.9 | |
|
The Ford Mustang 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang 2006 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang 2009, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mustang 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang 2006 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 368 litres | |
| Ford Mustang 2006 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |