Ford Mustang 2014 vs Kia Cerato 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 159 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Kia Cerato. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 50 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Cerato) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 30 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 433 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`242 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |