Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 162 - 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 217 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 9.0 - 10.9 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 22 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 129 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |