Ford Mustang 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang 2005 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Mustang 2009 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 540 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 13.1 - 13.9 | |
|
Ford Mustang 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Mustang 2005 is smaller. Ford Mustang 2005 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 2009, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang 2005 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 379 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang 2009 has more luggage space. Ford Mustang 2005 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |