Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 32 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 110 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |