Ford Maverick 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick and Mitsubishi Pajero have the same engine power, but Ford Maverick torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is smaller. Ford Maverick is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford Maverick can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |