Ford Maverick 1996 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is more dynamic to drive. Ford Maverick engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 8 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.4 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Maverick is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford Maverick can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |