Ford Maverick 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 20 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Maverick consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.58 m | |
| Ford Maverick and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |