Ford Maverick 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is more dynamic to drive. Ford Maverick engine produces 25 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.59 m | |
| Ford Maverick and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |