Ford Maverick 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is more dynamic to drive. Ford Maverick engine produces 38 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Maverick and Land Rover Freelander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |