Ford Kuga 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Kuga is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 14 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |