Ford Kuga 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Body: Crossover / SUVMinivan / MPV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 370 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.5 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Kuga and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.4
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1360 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1500 km on highway
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.38 m
Width: 1.84 m1.83 m
Height: 1.69 m1.63 m
Ford Kuga is larger.
Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1603 litres1684 litres
Ford Kuga has 24 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 81 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2502`050
Safety:
Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 2008200
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Ford C-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv