Ford Kuga 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.4 | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1684 litres | |
Ford Kuga has 24 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 81 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |