Ford Fusion 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 204 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Ford Fusion petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford Fusion equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford Fusion is smaller. Ford Fusion is 32 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fusion is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Ford Fusion has 213 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`626 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |