Ford F150 2009 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 30 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 12.1 | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 87 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 41 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 504 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 1068 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford F150 (by 1351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |