Ford F150 2009 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 2009 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford F150 2003, but torque is 130 NM less than Ford F150 2003. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 14.7 | |
|
The Ford F150 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 2009 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150 2003, which means that by driving the Ford F150 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 114 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Ford F150 2009 is 20 cm longer than the Ford F150 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 2009 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`198 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |