Ford F150 2014 vs Toyota Tundra 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota Tundra, but torque is 34 NM less than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.8 | |
|
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 120 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.93 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 14.9 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 34 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |