Ford F150 2009 vs Ford F150 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 6.2 | 4.6 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 - 411 HP | 231 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 - 588 NM | 397 - 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 15.7 | 13.2 - 14.7 | |
|
Ford F150 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford F150 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford F150 2009 is larger. Ford F150 2009 is 20 cm longer than the Ford F150 2003, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 2009 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 13.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 2009 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford F150 2003, which means Ford F150 2009 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`390 | ~ 3`149 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |