Ford Explorer 2002 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Explorer is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota 4-Runner is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 4.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 304 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 495 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 1 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 804 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`595 | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |