Ford Escape 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Escape is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Land Rover Freelander has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 - 240 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 366 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 9.8 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Escape is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Ford Escape has 566 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |