Ford Escape 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Escape is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Kuga has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 - 240 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 366 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 9.8 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Ford Escape has 515 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 352 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Ford Escape can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |