Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 40 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
740 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1145 litres | 1120 litres | |
Ford EcoSport has 55 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 25 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`730 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 600 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |