Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 and Ford EcoSport 2017 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport 2013 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2017 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2017 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport 2017 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |