Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013

 
Ford EcoSport
2013 - 2015
Suzuki SX4
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP120 HP
Torque: 205 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds12 seconds
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 30 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.2
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1350 km on highway
Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.58 m
Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1269 litres
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space.
Ford EcoSport has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`870
Safety:
Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 2009200
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki SX4 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • higher safety
    • better safety assist technologies
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv