Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.0 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |