Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Ford EcoSport 2013 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford EcoSport 2017. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.1 | |
The Ford EcoSport 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport 2013 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Ford EcoSport 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport 2013 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | 1`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Ford EcoSport 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport 2013 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport 2017, so Ford EcoSport 2017 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9800 | 14 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |