Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017

 
Ford EcoSport
2013 - 2015
Ford EcoSport
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP100 HP
Torque: 205 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds14 seconds
Ford EcoSport 2013 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford EcoSport 2017.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.1
The Ford EcoSport 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport 2013 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1360 km on highway
Ford EcoSport 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.10 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.65 m
Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1238 litres
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport 2013 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`735
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Ford EcoSport 2017 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport 2013 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport 2017, so Ford EcoSport 2017 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 980014 600
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Ford EcoSport has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv