Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2017 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport 2013 engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford EcoSport 2017. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport 2013 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2017 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2017 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford EcoSport 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport 2017 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport 2013 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |