Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is larger, but lower. Ford EcoSport is 1 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 67 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |