Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Suzuki SX4 2013

 
Ford EcoSport
2015 - 2017
Suzuki SX4
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP120 HP
Torque: 215 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds12 seconds
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 25 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1350 km on highway
850 km with real consumption1020 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.58 m
Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1269 litres
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space.
Ford EcoSport has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`870
Safety:
Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 98008200
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki SX4 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • higher safety
    • better safety assist technologies
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv