Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 19 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |