Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015

 
Ford EcoSport
2015 - 2017
Mitsubishi ASX
2015 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP114 HP
Torque: 215 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds11.2 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 19 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1360 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1500 km on highway
850 km with real consumption1100 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)180 mm (7.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1219 litres
Ford EcoSport has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`760no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better
Average price (€): 980011 200
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv