Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Ford EcoSport 2017

 
Ford EcoSport
2015 - 2017
Ford EcoSport
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP100 HP
Torque: 215 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds14 seconds
Ford EcoSport 2015 engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Ford EcoSport 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford EcoSport 2015 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport 2015 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport 2015 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1360 km on highway
850 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Ford EcoSport 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2015 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2015 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.10 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.65 m
Ford EcoSport 2015 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1238 litres
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport 2015 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2015 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`735
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 10 20014 600
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Ford EcoSport has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv