Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 35 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 23 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`888 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |