Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013

 
Ford EcoSport
2015 - 2017
Chevrolet Trax
2013 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP130 HP
Torque: 215 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds10.5 seconds
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 35 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1130 km on highway
850 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.25 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.65 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litresno data
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 23 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`888
Safety:
Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 98008200
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chevrolet Trax has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv