Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Ford EcoSport 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 and Ford EcoSport 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford EcoSport 2017 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2016, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport 2017 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford EcoSport 2017 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2017 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2017 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford EcoSport 2017 has 23 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2016. The Ford EcoSport 2016 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |