Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 89 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.4 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford EcoSport has 149 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 452 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |