Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Suzuki SX4 2013

 
Ford EcoSport
2012 - 2017
Suzuki SX4
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP120 HP
Torque: 186 NM156 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12 seconds
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 20 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.35.9
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford EcoSport consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 360 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway920 km on highway
Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.01 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.67 m1.58 m
Ford EcoSport is 29 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1269 litres
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space.
Ford EcoSport has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`730
Safety:
Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 10 4009200
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • more power
Suzuki SX4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv