Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.9 | |
| Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford EcoSport is 28 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |