Ford Cougar 1998 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Cougar is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi Eclipse is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 9.7 | |
|
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Cougar is larger. Ford Cougar is 32 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Cougar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 241 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Cougar has more luggage capacity. Ford Cougar has 189 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Ford Cougar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |