Ford Cougar 1998 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 120 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 152 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 6.8 - 7.0 | |
|
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Cougar is larger, but lower. Ford Cougar is 26 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Cougar is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Cougar has 11 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Ford Cougar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Ford Cougar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`583 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Honda Civic has
| |