Ford Cougar 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ford Cougar is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 12.0 | |
|
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.35 m | |
| Ford Cougar is 4 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Cougar is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Ford Cougar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
| |