Ford Cougar 1998 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 8.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Ford Cougar is smaller. Ford Cougar is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Cougar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |