Ford C-Max 2014 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014

 
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan
2014 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.2 seconds
Ford C-Max and Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan have the same engine power, but Ford C-Max torque is 80 NM more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1360 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1500 km on highway1280 km on highway
960 km with real consumption870 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.34 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.63 m1.58 m
Ford C-Max is larger.
Ford C-Max is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1684 litresno data
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford C-Max has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`980
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

high
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 940011 800
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv