Ford C-Max 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 14 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 3 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 113 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |