Ford C-Max 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.62 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 30 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |