Ford C-Max 2003 vs Renault Scenic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 80 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, a Ford C-Max with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford C-Max is 8 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 120 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 1`955 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |