Ford C-Max 2003 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford C-Max is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 304 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |