Ford B-Max 2012 vs Citroen Nemo 2009

 
Ford B-Max
2012 - 2012
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP68 HP
Torque: 215 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds18 seconds
Ford B-Max engine produces 27 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Citroen Nemo.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.04.5
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Ford B-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford B-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that by driving the Ford B-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford B-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1200 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1180 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Ford B-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m3.96 m
Width: 1.75 m2.02 m
Height: 1.60 m1.72 m
Ford B-Max is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 318 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1386 litresno data
Citroen Nemo has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford B-Max has 42 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. This could mean that the Ford B-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Ford B-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`700
Safety:
Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford B-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 78002800
Pros and Cons: Ford B-Max has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Citroen Nemo has
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv